Tax Accountants

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 8 May 2009

Tax madness

Posted on 09:37 by Unknown
Tax Lawyer's blog post today includes tournament brackets for "Tax Madness: All Time Greatest Code Section."

Isn't the term "tax madness" redundant?

Anyhow, this is a fun exercise for us tax geeks. Pappas asks at the end of the post: "What code section do you think is the 'greatest?' "

Being obsessed with detail as I am, I immediately thought: "Well, what do you mean by greatest? Greatest in terms of saving taxpayers money, generating tax revenue, collecting tax revenue, or another definition altogether?"

I drove my professors crazy in college, as you can imagine. ("But what do you mean by this question?" "What if this exception applies?" "What if I read it this way instead?")

Pappas suggests the greatest code section is 3402, reasoning that: "Withholding is the chief administrative mechanism enabling the federal government to collect, without significant protest, sufficient private resources to fund an ever-expanding government."

So I agree that this is the greatest section in terms of tax collection.

I'm thinking "greatest" in terms of the impact on taxpayers, whether for good or ill. And though one could argue that the withholding section has the greatest impact, my inclination would be to crown the code section that imposes the tax in the first place. In general, that's code section 61 (which Pappas named as the runner-up to 3402).

Section 61 says: "Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle gross income means all income from whatever source derived."

Everything is taxable, unless we give you a special hall pass to exclude it. Casts a pretty wide net, eh?
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Obama targets multinational corporations
    The President spoke today of his administration's plans to increase the amount of taxes paid by U.S.-based multinational corporations. ...
  • And so it begins
    Spending a beautiful Friday afternoon with four kids running around (only two are mine), I took a moment to check Twitter chatter, and was e...
  • Thanks guys and gals
    Just wanted to say a quick thanks to the expert guys and gals who have mentioned me in their online writings. After all, the jury may still...
  • An Inconvenient Tax
    Recently, I posted about my concerns that those seeking tax simplification were not effectively represented in Washington. I thought about ...
  • Speaking out
    Kudos to Joe Kristan for encouraging us to write our senators, and providing links to do so, to speak out against the S corp tax in the ex...
  • What I missed
    After a much-needed vacation (my first of the year), I'm making my way through the 1000+ unread items in Google Reader. Here are a few ...
  • Slacker
    I'm a blogging slacker. I hesitate to post when I haven't kept up on all the other blogging out there, which is really hard to do. ...
  • When tax preparers attack
    The battles continue in the tax blogging world. After a lengthy and thorough debate on tax preparer regulation (tax pros are good at thoro...
  • Fair is fair
    As a nation we have grown accustom to certain tax benefits, including the exclusion of health insurance benefits from income. For most of my...
  • Where do I sign up?
    I'm still new to this tax blogging world, but I've certainly read enough to know that I am not alone in thinking tax law is way too ...

Categories

  • Accounting and Auditing
  • Blogosphere
  • California
  • Celebrities
  • CPAs
  • Education
  • Estate Tax
  • Ethics
  • Health Insurance
  • IRS
  • Obama Administration
  • Tax Enforcement
  • Tax Policy
  • Tax Preparation
  • Tax Professionals
  • Tax Reform

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (1)
    • ►  September (1)
  • ►  2011 (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2010 (18)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2009 (40)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ▼  May (8)
      • Pizza for tax evasion?
      • Thanks guys and gals
      • Horse play
      • Yikes: Ohio to subsidize Hollywood
      • "Head of the Class" star owes big time
      • Tax madness
      • Obama targets multinational corporations
      • Bias disclosure
    • ►  April (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile