Tax Accountants

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 26 May 2010

The fuzzy definitions

Posted on 13:35 by Unknown
Reading an interesting post today by Joe Kristan got me thinking about how the tax code sometimes wades into murky waters. The world is not black and white, and so I recognize that the tax law cannot be written to clearly cover every situation. That said, I think the law should avoid the gray area when it can.

Joe writes about a new extender bill that would impose self-employment tax on certain S corporation K-1 income. He writes in his post titled Reputation and Skill:
If enacted, as seems likely, this rule would create odd problems.

It would penalize the smallest personal service providers to the benefit of their larger competitors.. A sole proprietorship would pay taxes at a rate at least 2.9% higher than a competitor whose "principal asset" is the reputation of more than three employees.

The bill also will require businesses and the IRS to determine what the "principal asset" of a personal service corporation is. The bill obviously requires the valuation of intangible assets -- reputation and skill -- but in a way not elsewhere attempted in the tax law. How do you do this?

I agree that there are a lot of potential issues involved if the tax law were to require that we determine a monetary value for "reputation and skill."

This reminded me of a discussion in my graduate course on estate and gift tax, taught by the brilliant and engaging Dr. Boyd Randall. He told us about how previous tax law required that the gross estate include the value of gifts "made in contemplation of death." Answer.com echoes what Dr. Randall said:
Because determining whether a gift was in contemplation of death turned out to be subjective, difficult to prove, and somewhat morbid, a 1976 amendment to the estate tax law automatically included any gift that a decedent made within three years of death (26 U.S.C.A. § 2035(a)).
If this professional service S corporation law is enacted, I will be interested to see how we talk about it a few years down the road. I'm guessing we'll say something like: "Because determining the value of a shareholder's reputation and skill turned out to be subjective, difficult to prove, and somewhat arbitrary, a 2016 amended to the tax code eliminated the self-employment tax on professional service S corporations."

I guess I'll just have to wait and see.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Tax Policy | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • And so it begins
    Spending a beautiful Friday afternoon with four kids running around (only two are mine), I took a moment to check Twitter chatter, and was e...
  • You know you're addicted to Twitter when...
    You're checking Twitter while sitting in the Orpheum Theater in San Francisco waiting for Wicked to begin. In my defense, I had not bee...

Categories

  • Accounting and Auditing
  • Blogosphere
  • California
  • Celebrities
  • CPAs
  • Education
  • Estate Tax
  • Ethics
  • Health Insurance
  • IRS
  • Obama Administration
  • Tax Enforcement
  • Tax Policy
  • Tax Preparation
  • Tax Professionals
  • Tax Reform

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (1)
    • ►  September (1)
  • ►  2011 (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ▼  2010 (18)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ▼  May (4)
      • Making headlines
      • The fuzzy definitions
      • Shooting just around the corner
      • Good old stereotypes
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2009 (40)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile