Murray Blum for President

I've now been in the S.F. Bay Area for one week; and in addition to loving the lack of humidity and beautiful views, I am noticing how the fiscal troubles of the state seem to come up everywhere I turn.

A friend in law enforcement discussed rumors that Oakland would be cutting 200 officers. A family member working for the state is down to four days a week since weekly furlough days were enacted. The registrar at my daughter's school said the calendar would be changing, as they will be taking furlough days.

My impression is that California, like many people, was not closely watching expenditures when times were good. And now times are not so good. On both the micro and macro scales, we need to make careful, informed decisions about how we spend our money. That requires we take the time to look at where the money is going. This includes where the money goes both via direct spending and via tax benefits, as Professor Nellen points out in a great discussion of Increasing attention on tax expenditures.

Maybe the movie Dave was right, and we just need to get an everyday CPA into the White House to dig through the books.

Read More

Speaking out

Kudos to Joe Kristan for encouraging us to write our senators, and providing links to do so, to speak out against the S corp tax in the extender bill. This is social media at its best. Let's show people that tax folks aren't all that quiet.

Read More

Making headlines

Tax blogger Robert Flach recently mentioned the long-running television series Law & Order. The other day, I heard about a recent episode ("The Taxman Cometh") where the motive turned out to be timing a person's death to avoid the estate tax. (They may have gotten the idea from the Colbert Report.)

Maybe if the estate tax keeps making headlines, it will actually get addressed by Congress. Just maybe...

Read More

The fuzzy definitions

Reading an interesting post today by Joe Kristan got me thinking about how the tax code sometimes wades into murky waters. The world is not black and white, and so I recognize that the tax law cannot be written to clearly cover every situation. That said, I think the law should avoid the gray area when it can.

Joe writes about a new extender bill that would impose self-employment tax on certain S corporation K-1 income. He writes in his post titled Reputation and Skill:

If enacted, as seems likely, this rule would create odd problems.

It would penalize the smallest personal service providers to the benefit of their larger competitors.. A sole proprietorship would pay taxes at a rate at least 2.9% higher than a competitor whose "principal asset" is the reputation of more than three employees.

The bill also will require businesses and the IRS to determine what the "principal asset" of a personal service corporation is. The bill obviously requires the valuation of intangible assets -- reputation and skill -- but in a way not elsewhere attempted in the tax law. How do you do this?

I agree that there are a lot of potential issues involved if the tax law were to require that we determine a monetary value for "reputation and skill."

This reminded me of a discussion in my graduate course on estate and gift tax, taught by the brilliant and engaging Dr. Boyd Randall. He told us about how previous tax law required that the gross estate include the value of gifts "made in contemplation of death." Answer.com echoes what Dr. Randall said:

Because determining whether a gift was in contemplation of death turned out to be subjective, difficult to prove, and somewhat morbid, a 1976 amendment to the estate tax law automatically included any gift that a decedent made within three years of death (26 U.S.C.A. § 2035(a)).

If this professional service S corporation law is enacted, I will be interested to see how we talk about it a few years down the road. I'm guessing we'll say something like: "Because determining the value of a shareholder's reputation and skill turned out to be subjective, difficult to prove, and somewhat arbitrary, a 2016 amended to the tax code eliminated the self-employment tax on professional service S corporations."

I guess I'll just have to wait and see.

Read More

Shooting just around the corner

I just read Peter Pappas' post about a man in Dayton, Ohio opening fire on an H&R Block employee (which he read about on WebCPA). According to Yahoo! maps, the bar where the shooting took place is just over 7 miles from my house. That's a little frightening.

This seems to be a classic example of shooting the messenger (forgive the pun, as I don't know another way to say it!). And as long as the system is out of control, I wager we'll continue to see taxpayers blaming tax professionals. I figure the only way this will slow down is if we get a system in place that is transparent and understandable to taxpayers. We all know it, now we've got to figure out how to make it happen.

A place to start the dialogue is Professor Nellen's 21 Century Taxation blog, which recently celebrated its third anniversary (congrats!). If we can somehow manage to get a lot of us "messengers" in a dialogue and come to some agreement, maybe we could make progress on getting the public and Congress on board with serious reform. Of course, getting a large body of tax professionals to agree on a reform plan is going to take some work. I figure once I get these kids a little older, I'll make that one of my long, long term projects. Someday my kids will thank me for it! Maybe...

In the meantime, I'll be safe from angry Dayton taxpayers when I move to California in a few weeks. Although I'm guessing the taxpayers aren't much happier there.

Read More

Good old stereotypes

Last night, I got a really good laugh out of last week's episode of Parks and Recreation, especially the part where a stereotypical accountant discusses taxes and Quickbooks.

The premise is the town of Pawnee, Indiana holding an all-night telethon. When the scheduled star doesn't show, they get really desperate, and the tax guy in front of the camera is evidence of their desperation. As the accountant drones on: "When it comes to preparing taxes..." the main character then observes: "This is a disaster."

What, people don't think accountants teaching how to prepare taxes makes for entertaining television?

TV really has fun with the accountant stereotype. Kay Bell has blogged about a comedy in the works about IRS agents. I'm guessing they won't all be perky and engaging.

This clip below has the second bit with the CPA, starting at around :50 seconds, as he concludes his "Quick look at Quickbooks." Classic! I just wish I could get both clips of him. (The first clip of him is at around 13:15 of the full episode here.)

Read More

Under Pressure

Dan Meyer of TickMarks pays me a huge honor in yesterday's post: Too Long Between Posts--Apologies ..

I look forward to seeing the posts of Robert Flach (Wandering Tax Pro), Monica Lavwer (Confessions of a CPA and the Tax CPA)and others as they return to blogging after their working hiatus. Major applause to Joe Kristan, Russ Fox and other working tax accountants (yes, and Peter Pappas, Kelly Erb and tax lawyers too) who were able to post in the midst of the maelstrom.

First off, I've got to agree 100% that the practitioners who blogged through the season quite simply rock. They are definitely in a league of their own. And in this league we can't forget Trish McIntire, who's April 14 "A Little Rant" made me smile. Stacie Clifford also managed to keep posting throughout, though she admits most were borrowed from the IRS.

Second, I must say I am pleasantly surprised that Dan would look forward to my writing. Few things feel as marvelous as respect from one's mentors and peers.

Last, but not least, to have my name even listed in such an impressive group, I feel like I better step up my game! It would sure be a shame if, a year from now, bloggers wrote: "Remember that blog that seemed to have good stuff, then completely choked?"

So with that classic CPA perfectionist thought in mind, I thought I'd share one of my favorite songs.

Read More